What the handoff document gets wrong, most serious first. Six of these are things an enforcement officer or a retail buyer would pick up.
Not everything is a problem — these came back clean, and two of them are worth money.
Recomputed from the handoff's own macro figures, with fibre at 2 kcal/g in the energy denominator as Reg. 1169/2011 Annex XIV requires. “High protein” needs 20% of energy from protein; “high fibre” needs 6 g per 100 g.
| Recipe | kcal / pot | % energy protein | High protein | Fibre g/100g | High fibre | Fat g/100g | Low fat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Berry & Vanilla | 422 | 21.06% | Pass | 8.31 | Pass | 8.72 | n/a |
| 2 · Cheddar & Chive | 535 | 20.71% | Pass by 0.71 pp | 9.01 | Pass | 15.38 | n/a |
| 3 · Cinnamon & Pumpkin | 499 | 20.62% | Pass by 0.62 pp | 9.09 | Pass | 13.33 | n/a |
| 4 · Vanilla Crisp | 314 | 28.70% | Pass | 9.53 | Pass | 8.63 | Fails — 2.9× limit |
Recipe 4 is marketed as “Low-Fat”. The legal threshold is 3 g fat per 100 g; it has 8.63 g. Recipes 2 and 3 pass “high protein” on calculated values with under one percentage point to spare — lab analysis could take either below the line.